What's different in so many situations where the nomads are involved? A Chiari
existed an attempt to create an integration of a group of families of gypsies, who for years lived in the suburbs, with the creation of a field equipped with lots of wooden houses, with the contribution of the region.
This is because a group of people did not feel safe
fact that these gypsies lived in disarray, and to create a decent future for new generations, with regular contact with the control but friendship and mutual respect. In other
reality the situation is not the same, see examples in the news very degraded areas with lack of everything from hygiene to decent housing, and this can only bring positive reviews, so even a Christian "extreme" should stand as Moreover there are other fields maintained to excellent.
Then you must be able to distinguish those who protest against uncivilized presence of such groups in the suburbs, in defense of his own safety, by those who are purely Racist or political leanings, and the slogan "ammazziamoli all" is foolish, especially if not violent and is not acceptable.
But another thing is to not forget that even here in Chiari gypsies stealing and personally it was not pleasant, so the demand for civil security is more than legitimate.
So do not think it is wiser to knowledge integration, which does not throw her in the abandoned somewhere else? And who are the ones who lose out if not innocent, the new generations who have no sins until they are forced against their degradation?
The result of "the way the nomads" in Chiari was the election of a Mayor League's "business" in the sense that in addition to the building of Christian values \u200b\u200bin its mandate, I have not seen sowing, if the various "blessings" parishioners
... The differences are there, you know, we Nomads and Nomads are. ... we do not
whole lump, for better or for worse, we learn to bless the well.
0 comments:
Post a Comment